A surprising sense of momentum runs through the UK’s latest diplomatic move, almost as if the political establishment finally caught up with what so many ordinary people have been quietly insisting for years. With public backing at levels that politicians usually only dream of, Foreign Secretary Yvette Cooper has confirmed that she will convene the inaugural meeting of the International Fund for Israeli-Palestinian Peace this coming March at Lancaster House. The tone of the announcement felt unusually confident for a government that often treads cautiously on foreign-policy landmines, probably because the numbers make the argument for them: 84% of UK respondents who expressed an opinion support the creation of the Fund, and 87% say Britain should put in at least £5 million.

Curious how Washington keeps circling back to the same uneasy dance with Moscow, this whole episode feels like one of those moments where you blink and suddenly the geopolitical logic has flipped without any corresponding shift on the ground. The October sanctions on Rosneft and Lukoil were the only truly consequential economic pressure the Trump administration ever put on Russia to push it toward meaningful negotiation over Ukraine. Those measures hit revenue streams, strategic capabilities, and Kremlin-aligned elites in ways Moscow genuinely dislikes.

William J. Sanchez, former Special Counsel to President George W. Bush, has urged Kamala Harris, the current presidential candidate, to consider influential Hispanic figures for her vice presidential pick. He specifically highlighted Senator Catherine Cortez Masto as a potential candidate. Sanchez, an experienced advisor with over two decades of expertise in the Department of Justice and the Department of Homeland Security, emphasized the significance of Hispanic representation in top government roles.

As criticism mounts against Venezuela’s authoritarian leader Nicolás Maduro following deadly protests sparked by a disputed presidential election, the prospects of the democratic opposition seizing power have become a focal point of both national and international discourse. The situation is a complex interplay of internal dynamics and external influences, each contributing to the precarious balance of power in the country. Internally, the democratic opposition’s chances hinge significantly on its ability to unify.

The New York Times and the BBC have, according to many critics, long abandoned their journalistic integrity and moral compass, veering into territories where they often seem to side with terror groups like Hamas and Hezbollah. This sharp deviation from the core tenets of unbiased journalism raises significant concerns about their role in shaping public opinion and informing global audiences. The New York Times, once hailed as the pinnacle of balanced and rigorous reporting, has faced relentless criticism for its perceived partiality.

BREAKING: Hundreds of Maduro-supporters on motorcycles armed with guns are patrolling the streets of Caracas, threatening polling station workers and controllers tasked with keeping the vote counting transparent. The communists are stealing the election pic.twitter.com/VKR9amBMk8 — Visegrád 24 (@visegrad24) July 28, 2024 Maduro thugs are stealing the election in Venezuela. This is the ultimate test for Harris-Biden administration that always let the evil win. The Biden administration’s decision to lift sanctions on Venezuelan oil, ostensibly in exchange for hollow promises of free elections from the Maduro regime, epitomizes a misguided and weak foreign policy approach.

The contested Venezuelan elections have sparked significant international concern regarding the legitimacy of Nicolás Maduro’s vote count. A number of countries have openly refused to recognize the results or have demanded greater transparency and verification of the electoral process. These countries include Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica, Guatemala, El Salvador, the European Union, Italy, Panama, Paraguay, Peru, Portugal, Spain, the United States, and Uruguay. This collective stance highlights the widespread skepticism and the call for a more transparent and fair electoral process in Venezuela.